"James Lyons-Weiler, PhD"
Delaware Medical Freedom Alliance, posted August 18, 2022 [filmed June 7, 2021]
https://rumble.com/v1ghbuf-james-lyons-weiler-phd.html
RUMBLE PAGE DESCRIPTION: "Dr. James Lyons-Weiler is a father, research scientist, author, and founder and CEO of the Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge, also known as IPAK. He is Editor-in-Chief of the peer reviewed journal, Science, Public Health Policy and the Law. He has over 20 years’ experience as a biomedical and clinical research scientist. Dr. Lyons-Weiler has published three books, and over 58 research studies. He has joined forces with other scientists at IPAK, where research is performed in the public interest aimed at finding ways to reduce human suffering. His latest research has focused on the discovery of chronic health issues associated with higher vaccine uptake and the role of autoreactogenic viral epitopes in the symptoms of COVID19 disease and COVID19 vaccine reactions. He is the architect of Plan B, a plan to replace the defunct public health system in the United States, host of the podcast Unbreaking Science. Presentation Topic: Clinical and immunologic predictors of COVID-19 infection and vaccination health outcomes.
www.JamesLyonsWeiler.com "
TRANSCRIPT
TRANSCRIBER'S NOTES:
- Dr Lyons-Weiler's Substack is Popular Rationalism
https://popularrationalism.substack.com- This is an Internet presentation. Dr. Lyons-Weiler addresses the camera directly.
DR. JAMES LYONS-WEILER: Thank you very much. It's a very, very high honor to be part of this, and the previous speakers were so eloquent and correct. This is a sign of success that people are coming to together around this issue.
Dr. Malone did a fantastic job laying out the code of federal regulations regarding restrictions on people doing human subjects research, and the rights of participants and nonparticipants in human subject research.[1] I was drilled on that very topic every year for 20 years I was in academic medicine. And he's got it right. There's special protections for pregnant women and for children in those codes of federal regulations.
However, the fine print on that is that the 21st century's CURES Act, at the last moment they snuck in a clause that if the people doing the research say that the risk, if they have determined that the risk to the participants is low, they don't have to provide you with informed consent.[2] So whatever, if you do go and hire legal counsel, they're going to watch out for that 21st century CURES Act clause because, and this where, you know, it really matters that we do debate and understand the science.
I'm a lifelong biomedical research scientist and it blows my mind that somehow ASIP[3] was given a presentation by Dr. Tim Shimabukuru[4] where he analyzed the VAERS data[5] and looked at all available data from all the clinical trials, and he said that no serious adverse events could be attributed to the vaccine. Zero. This is after there's a study, peer-reviewed study, in the Lancet on Bell's Palsy. This is after the reports of thrombosis. This is now on top of, we've got myocarditis, right?
So the specific bias in vaccine safety science is to manipulate the data, manipulate the study design, manipulate the conclusions, alter the conclusions. They have a screening committee. Dr. William Thompson[6] told Brian Hooker, Dr. Brian Hooker,[7] in taped conferences, telephone calls, about the practice. Every vaccine safety study that goes out of the CDC[8] has to go to a sanitation committee, that's my word for it, to make sure that the interpretation of the science doesn't shed a bad light on vaccines.
2:26
Now you might be surprised to learn, I have 2 adult sons, they're fully vaccinated according to the CDC's recommendation, except for the HPV vaccine. OK?
So it is unethical to participate in a research program of any kind, whether it's a biomedical drug, a pharmaceutical drug, or a biomedical device, or a vaccine, where the participants are not given any benefit, zero benefit, zero protection if the vaccine's not a success.
3:03
So the science is very, very, very important.
We were misled on the efficacy of the Moderna vaccine, for instance. We were misled very seriously. We were told that it was 95% effective. In order to get that to the 95% effective they removed the people from the vaccine trial who developed covid after the first dose. They were not given the second dose of the vaccine or the placebo. If you put those numbers back in, which I have done, and I did this months and months ago, you end up with 75% efficacy. Now why is that important? It still sounds pretty good, but why is that important?
Because it means the difference between, well, 95% efficacy you can get herd immunity at 66% vaccine coverage. But at 75% you can get herd immunity at 100% coverage. That's a huge difference.
Knowing that there are people in the country who will not vaccinate, knowing that people are watching this as an experimental vaccine, and knowing that vaccine risk awareness has increased, they realize they can't get to 100%. So the coercion is brought in. The coercion is illegal. The coercion is unethical.
But my view on the whole vaccination program is unless they are 100% forthright with the risks, as Dr. Malone said, go to your local drug store, ask for the vaccine insert for a covid 19 mRNA vaccine, you'll be given a blank sheet of paper.[9]
There's no communication to the participants about known risks.
During the clinical trials the pharmaceutical companies, the vaccine manufacturers actually paid medical doctors to rule out any adverse events that might be associated in the first round of human studies. How do they know it's not associated? How do they know that the myocarditis and the thrombosis that they saw, and the Bell's Palsy, could be ruled out? When it's the very first in man episode!
First in man episode means that no one knows the causality.
If you get injured, by a vaccine or killed or a loved one of yours is killed by a vaccine, you have to go to to the National Vaccine Compensation Injury Program and you have to sue the government and it can take 10 years to determine causality.[10] So how do they know in the short few days that they had?
Second, many of the reports that came out about these vaccines were not peer-reviewed. They were published as press releases.
The science is very much in question, the science is very much, and I respectfully disagree with Dr. Malone, the very science is very, very much a winning argument, and we are winning. We are winning hand over fist on this because if we stick with the requirements of empirical vaccine safety science, empirical vaccine efficacy science, empirical biomedical science, we win. That is, humanity wins.
It's not us versus—, pro-vaxxers versus nonvaxxers. This is 100% about not allowing them to create public health policy that is not founded on valid, credible science. That's what this is about.
And I have taken it to the extent where I have proposed that we defund the CDC. Specifically I have proposed Plan B to replace public health as we know it. Because it is a raw debacle. It is a, it is terrible what they've done to science in general. OK?
So yes, we need information, yes, we need comprehension. How can the public comprehend this complex science without interpreters if they're given blank vaccine information sheets?
And yes, voluntariness. I applaud you for standing up for my body, my choice.
7:02
Now what I came here to talk with you about are the known risk factors and how the next phase of science, if the vaccine program continues, and I think that's a big if, if the vaccine program continues, right, well we'll see when the boosters are offered if pathogenic priming occurs, if the vaccines before have primed individuals for more serious vaccine adverse events or more serious covid 19. Look up my name, Lyons-Weiler, and pathogenic priming, and you'll see that I predicted this in April.
7:33
But the known risk factors include age. So why are we sending 80 year-olds? For serious covid 19 the known risk factors include age. Why are we sending 80 year-olds home with a positive PCR test and telling them to wait to see if they need emergency care?
This is an unethical aspect of the vaccine program. They're told to go home without any treatment, so they're sufficient, and Dr. Fauci said this himself, we don't want too many people getting this virus because if they do we won't need the vaccine. That's a direct quote.
So it is absolutely imperative that you stay on the science, it's very important that you take a good look at it.
The risk factors that we could use are not being used. The Lancet has publications on risk factors,
which proteins to look at. I would like to add Th2 skew to the risk factors, to survey patients to determine, OK, yes, you're of a certain age, yes you have diabetes, but none of the other risk factors say that you're at risk of serious covid 19. That's very important information. And then we can also use some of those risk factors maybe to predict who's going to have a serious adverse event to the vaccine.
But the first thing we have to do is admit that vaccine risk exists! We have to admit it. We have to admit that people die from vaccines, and these vaccines, we have to admit that people get sick from these vaccines.
And, my message to you tonight is that public health in the United States of America has to grow up. The denialism is not working anymore. The jig is up. The public knows, too many people know, it's out there. You can't deny your way out of this anymore, and you risk losing it all. All of it. You will not have a public health program as you recognize it if you continue this pathway.
Thank you.
9:26
TEXT ON SCREEN: For more information:
delawareMFA.org
PatriotsForDelaware.com
9:31
[END]
# # #
TRANSCRIBER'S NOTES
[1] See:
Dr. Robert Malone Talks Bioethics with the Delaware Medical Freedom Alliance
"These remain experimental vaccines. There's no debate about that. So long as they're under Emergency Use Authorization they are by definition experimental vaccines... And right now I can tell you in terms of this space, they're not following their own rules and policy. And so if you want to overcome that and make your case, in my opinion, you can argue about the science all day long and you'll probably lose. But if you argue about the bioethics and about standard federal policy that they're supposed to go to to make these decisions, I think you'll win."
Transcript: https://transcriberb.dreamwidth.org/212637.html
Source video:
"Dr. Robert Malone, MD, MA"
Delaware Medical Freedom Alliance, posted August 18, 2022 [filmed June 7, 2021]
https://rumble.com/v1ghgpz-dr.-robert-malone-md-ma.html
[2] For the full text of the CURES Act see:
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-114publ255/pdf/PLAW-114publ255.pdfSee specificaly Sec. 3024. Informed consent waiver or alteration for clinical investigations.
"The Cures Act, or the 21st Century Cures Act, passed overwhelmingly in both the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate with strong bipartisan support, and was signed into law on December 13, 2016. The legislation provides NIH with critical tools and resources to advance biomedical research across the spectrum, from foundational basic research studies to advanced clinical trials of promising new therapies. "
÷ Source:
https://www.nih.gov/21st-century-cures-act
[3] ASIP is the US Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. See: https://www.cdc.gov/acip
[4] Tom Shimabukuro, CDC Covid-19 Immunization Safety Unit.
[5] VAERS is the official US government Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System.
https://vaers.hhs.gov/about.html
It is co-managed by CDC and FDA. See: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/ensuringsafety/monitoring/vaers/index.html
(Note: https://openvaers.com provides VAERS data in a more reader-friendly presentation)
[6] "In 2013 and 2014, Hooker worked with CDC whistleblower, Dr. William Thompson, to expose fraud and corruption within vaccine safety research in the CDC which led to the release of over 10,000 pages of documents."
— Source:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/authors/brian-hooker-ph-d/
See also:
"It’s Been 10 Years Since a Whistleblower Exposed the CDC’s Cover-up of the Link Between Vaccines and Autism. The Agency Has Done Nothing.
Ten years after a whistleblower at the CDC leaked data showing the agency identified a link between the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine and autism in African American boys, the agency has done nothing to address the issue."
Brenda Baletti, Ph.D., August 28, 2024
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/cdc-whistleblower-mmr-vaccine-autism-link/
Note: This article includes link to the PDF of the statement from William W. Thompson, 2014
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/William-Thompson-statement-27-August-2014.pdf
[7] Brian S. Hooker, Ph.D., is chief scientific officer at Children’s Health Defense and professor emeritus of biology at Simpson University in Redding, California. For a more extensive biographical note, see:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/authors/brian-hooker-ph-d/[8] US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
https://cdc.gov[9] See for example:
Dr. Renata Moon Unfolds the Package Insert
"It's um, it's blank."
Transcript:
https://transcriberb.dreamwidth.org/38844.htmlSource video: Video clip at:
https://twitter.com/i/status/1600747817697280000Clip shows Dr. Renata Moon, MD, testifying in the roundtable discussion, COVID-19 Vaccines: What They Are, How They Work, and Possible Causes of Injuries hosted by US Senator Ron Johnson
Washington DC, December 7, 2022
[10] For the covid 19 "vaccines" specifically, because they are classified as "countermeasures" the relevant US entity is actually the CICP, the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program.
https://www.hrsa.gov/cicp>
List of Transcriptions by Transcriber B (home page)
1-Experts Speak Out*
#CENSORSHIP/PSY-OP [in progress]
#INFORMED-CONSENT/BIOETHICS/RIGHTS SUBCATEGORY #PACKAGE-INSERT [in progress]
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
transcriberb
![[staff profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user_staff.png){kind=small}
![[site community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/comm_staff.png){kind=small}